Khmer Rouge leaders guilty of crimes against humanity and jailed for life

"A UN-backed war crimes tribunal has found the Khmer Rouge’s Brother No 2 Nuon Chea and former head of state Khieu Samphan guilty of crimes against humanity and sentenced the two elderly men to life imprisonment, in a move heralded by human rights groups as a “historic victory” for the nation. The verdict comes nearly 40 years after the regime led by Pol Pot ended its murderous four-year reign over Cambodia, during which time nearly 2 million people – a quarter of the population – died from starvation, exhaustion, execution or lack of medical care as a result of the communist “utopia” experiment. Khieu Samphan, 83, known as “Mr Clean” for his reported incorruptibility, and Nuon Chea, 88, the Khmer Rouge’s chief ideologue, were both charged with crimes against humanity, homicide, torture, genocide and religious persecution, all committed during a regime that forced Cambodia into “a state of terror”, according to the tribunal’s chief judge Nil Nonn." The tribunal is the so-called "Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia" (ECCC) which represents a hybrid model of International Criminal Justice. Instead of an international criminal tribunal it's a cambodian court that receives international assistance from the United Nations Assistance to the Khmer Rouge Trials (UNAKRT). "In 1997, the government requested the United Nations (UN) to assist in establishing a trial to prosecute the senior leaders of the Khmer Rouge. In 2001, the Cambodian National Assembly passed a law to create a court to try serious crimes committed during the Khmer Rouge regime 1975-1979. This court is called the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia for the Prosecution of Crimes Committed during the Period of Democratic Kampuchea (Extraordinary Chambers or ECCC). The government of Cambodia insisted that, for the sake of the Cambodian people, the trial must be held in Cambodia using Cambodian staff and judges together with foreign personnel. Cambodia invited international participation due to the weakness of the Cambodian legal system and the international nature of the crimes, and to help in meeting international standards of justice. An agreement with the UN was ultimately reached in June 2003 detailing how the international community will assist and participate in the Extraordinary Chambers. This special new court was created by the government and the UN but it will be independent of them. It is a Cambodian court with international participation that will apply international standards." http://www.eccc.gov.kh/en/about-eccc/introduction Why was this model chosen? the website from ECCC tells us that "the hybrid tribunal model is seen as a way to provide full national involvement in the trials while at the same time ensuring that international standards are met. Unlike tribunals for Rwanda or the former Yugoslavia, these trials are not removed from the place where the crimes occurred. They are held in Cambodia, conducted mainly in Khmer, open to participation by Cambodian people and reported via local television, radio and newspapers" "The tribunal, launched in 2006 and once heralded as a great opportunity for Cambodia to confront its bloody past, has been bogged down by allegations of corruption and incompetence, spending up to the present day some $200m to convict only one defendant: the Khmer Rouge prison director Kaing Guek Eav, sentenced to life imprisonment in 2011. Illness and death have prevented other defendants from standing trial. Nuon Chea and Khieu Samphan, who both face an upcoming genocide trial, originally shared the dock with Khmer Rouge foreign minister Ieng Sary, who died in March, and his wife Ieng Thirith, the social affairs minister, who has dementia and was declared unfit for trial in 2012. The group’s top leader, Pol Pot, died in 1998. Despite the problems that have plagued the court, Lars Olsen, the court’s spokesman, called the verdict “a historic day” for both the people and legal system of Cambodia. “The victims have waited 35 years for legal accountability, and now that the tribunal has rendered a judgment, it is a clear milestone.” http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/07/khmer-rouge-leaders-guilty-of-crimes-against-humanity-and-jailed-for-life Here a link to a video about the ECCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b99IkHqt6aQ ECCC website: http://www.eccc.gov.kh/en UNAKRT website: http://www.unakrt-online.org/ You can find more information in this article: Michelle CASWELL. ¨Khmer Rouge archives: accountability, truth and memory in Cambodia¨. Archival science, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2010)

Spain. Why Transparency when you can have Opacity instead?

Spain has been in the last few months the star in a number of cases that have highlighted the difficulties in abandoning a traditional culture of secrecy and embracing the kind of transparency and freedom of information that we associate with democracies. It started in September 2013 with the announcement that the the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Disappearances/Pages/DisappearancesIndex.aspx
 would look at the measures taken by Spain and “analyze in particular issues related to truth, justice, reparation and memory for victims of enforced disappearances.” http://elpais.com/elpais/2013/09/19/inenglish/1379610567_137589.html






The announcement came the day after an Argentinean judge issued international arrest warrants for four former mid-level officers who are accused of torturing Spaniards during the later years of Franco’s dictatorship. The Buenos Aires court opened an investigation into the crimes based on the universal justice doctrine after the victims and their families filed a lawsuit in 2010. http://elpais.com/elpais/2013/09/19/inenglish/1379607609_049738.html


In October 2013, the spanish conservative government was rebuked by the UN Panel: "UN envoys Jasminka Dzumhur and Ariel Dulitzky informed Spain’s government that it should “take on its responsibility” and draw up “a national plan to search for the missing,” revoke the 1977 Amnesty Law and pave the way for cases of forced disappearance to be judged in the courts. The UN group reminded Spain that such crimes have no statute of limitations and called for the state to meet its “international obligations,” and to carry through to court the 114,000 counts of forced disappearance listed in suspended High Court Judge Baltasar Garzón’s 2008 universal justice suit. The envoys expressed disappointment that no such investigation is currently underway and that judges habitually decline to visit mass graves when informed of their discovery. They also insisted that Spain provide “every legal assistance” to investigations which are opened in other countries, such as has recently been the case in Argentina, and to embrace the concept of universal justice; Spain restricted its own judicial remit solely to cases involving Spanish nationals in 2009. The search for those who were arrested and executed by the Franco regime should not be seen as “a task to be carried out by families but an obligation of the Spanish state,” the envoys concluded. As a starting point, the UN recommended adopting Gárzon’s proposal that “the greatest institutional and financial aid” be afforded to the families of victims. Dzumhur and Dulitzky also noted that the level of official support depends entirely on which party is governing a region. The experts visited Madrid, Catalonia, Andalusia and the Basque Country and found that in some “the authorities assume responsibility for exhumations” while in others they are “completely oblivious” to the matter. In the same vein, the envoys criticized the “resistance” at institutional level over declassifying certain documents and the obstacles thrown up when families attempt to access essential information. “It depends entirely on the will of the individual public employee; we propose a law governing access to information that guarantees the right to know the truth.”


Far from moving in this direction, the spanish government moved to impulse in February 2014 a swift legal reform that limited the power of spanish judges to pursue human right violations beyond the spanish border based on the concept of Universal Justice: "Spain's MPs voted on Tuesday to push forward with a bill that limits the power of Spanish judges to pursue criminal cases outside the country, a move that human rights organisations said would end Spain's leading role as an enforcer of international justice. Last month, the ruling People's party (PP) tabled a fast-track legal change to curb the use of universal jurisdiction, a provision in international law that allows judges to try cases of human rights abuses committed in other countries. Since being adopted into Spanish law nearly two decades ago, the doctrine has allowed Spanish judges to reach beyond their borders and investigate serious human rights abuses in countries such as Argentina, Rwanda and Guatemala." http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/11/spain-end-judges-trials-foreign-human-rights-abuses


To complete this dismal panorama, the government blocked in Parliament the initiative to open the access to the historical archives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (that have been subjected to security classification since 2010) and military files from 1936 to 1968 which are still classified http://www.acal.es/index.php/noticias/1006-el-pp-bloquea-en-el-congreso-abrir-a-los-investigadores-archivos-historicos-diplomaticos-y-militares


This has led "El Pais" to speak about "Why Top Secret in Spain is forever": "British historians have had their chance to stick their noses into what were once the most top secret records from the Falklands War (1982). The latest disclosure was a ream of private papers kept by the recently deceased former prime minister, Margaret Thatcher, which reveals dissent among Conservatives over the war. But Spanish historians are not allowed the slightest peek at documents pertaining to significantly older military conflicts, such as the Ifni conflict (1957-58) or the Spanish Civil War (1936-39). All this classified information is still kept under lock and key in military archives, where access is intermittent and arbitrary. Former Defense Minister Carme Chacón, of the Socialist Party, tried to partly redress this lack of transparency by proposing to declassify 10,000 records of events that took place between 1936 and 1968, and which no longer posed a threat to the security of the state. These included documents about concentration camps and work battalions created by the Franco regime right after winning the Civil War; government policy on the Spanish protectorate in Morocco; projects for weapons manufacturing prior to 1968; operations in the former Spanish province of Sidi Ifni in North Africa; and finding crews for Italian and German war ships at Spanish ports during WWII. But her initiative never reached the Cabinet. General elections held in November 2011 handed power over to the conservative Popular Party (PP), although sources in the former Defense Ministry team say that "internal work was already completed" before that, and that the delay getting the project approved was just a problem of "scheduling." This timid attempt at greater historical transparency dissolved completely under the current Popular Party government." http://elpais.com/elpais/2013/05/10/inenglish/1368190494_378347.html

Archives of Dictatorships Colloquium. Pierrefitte-sur-Seine (I)

I had the pleasure to attend the Colloquium on Archives of Dictatorships organized by CECOJI and SIAF (Interministerial Service of French Archives) at the impressive new building of the French National Archives located at the outskirts of Paris, at Pierrefitte-sur-Seine. The colloquium was held from 24 to 25 January 2013.

CECOJI (Centre of Studies for the International Juridical Cooperation) was founded in 1995 and associates the University of Poitiers and the CRNS (National Center for Scientific Research) the main public research institution in France. CECOJI specializes in several fields, including human rights and international law. Therefore, the colloquium paid special attention to the confluence of human rights and international law in a controversial field such as the one presented by the archives of dictatorships and authoritarian governments (such as Vichy France). SIAF replaces since 2009 the Direction of French Archives as directing body of the French Public Archives. SIAF belongs to the French Ministry of Culture. I will try to cover the main issues treated at this interesting Colloquium in a series of posts, to avoid lengthy narratives

Back on the road again...

After a long time of silence (too many personal changes...) I'll try to reactivate this Blog. An interesting Colloquium on "Archives of Dictatorships" held at the new building of the French National Archives at Pierrefite-sur-Seine will provide the perfect excuse. Stay tuned!

7 archivist positions published for the International Residual Mechanism for UN Criminal Tribunals

The International Residual Mechanism for the UN Criminals Tribunals established in December 2010 is publishing 7 archivist positions. After publishing back in December 2011 a Chief Archivist (P-5) position based in The Hague, the Residual Mechanism is now publishing a Chied Deputy Archivist (P-4) position based in Arusha and a set of three positions each for both Arusha and The Hague: Archivist, Digital Archivist and Audiovisual Archivist, all of them at the P-3 level. Really a remarkable feat for a truly ambitious project.

University of Connecticut Libraries, Curator of Human Rights Collections

Position Announcement Title: University Librarian II (UCP 7) or University Librarian III (UCP 9) Department: Library Dodd Center Search #: 2012498 Campus/Location: Storrs Campus Position Summary Working in a team environment, the Curator of Human Rights performs curatorial work in support of Archives & Special Collections programs in the collecting area of Human Rights. Following established departmental procedures the curator acquires and processes archival collections and works closely with donors and potential donors. S/he works in close cooperation with other Curators, the Team Leader and subject Librarians to plan and establish area goals and to ensure that established collection and public service goals are met. The curator serves as primary contact to the Human Rights Institute. The curator provides in-person and written reference services and responds to requests to use human rights collections and materials, including determining access and intellectual property rights relating to access. Evening and/or weekend hours are occasionally required. Duties and Responsibilities 1. Collection Development - Performs curatorial duties for the Human Rights collections in all formats. - Serves as the primary contact with current and potential collection donors. - Prepares reformatted and born-digital material for ingest into the digital repository, including metadata and file format normalization. - Creates and maintains metadata and finding aids for the collections within his/her curatorial areas in accordance with area and professional best practices. - Develops and/or furthers knowledge of electronic resources, reference and specialized sources in the Human Rights. - - Assists in selecting human rights materials for library collections in collaboration with the appropriate subject Librarians. 2. Reference Service - Provides assistance to researchers using collections on site, electronically and by mail to ensure proper and appropriate use of unique materials. - Develops and maintains reference materials online to support research and teaching needs. - Provides general reference services at the Reading Room reference desk as assigned. 3. Instructional Service - When requested, develops and presents instructional programs for University faculty and students on the significance and use of collections in the curatorial area. - Develops instructional seminars, guides, bibliographies, brochures, handouts and online materials that teach the use of archival and library resources that support collections in the curatorial area. 4. Academic Liaison - Maintains regular contact with faculty as appropriate; attends and participates in Human Rights Institute meetings and public programs where appropriate. - Assists in selecting human rights materials for library collections in collaboration with the appropriate subject Librarians. 5. Team Development - Attends and participates in area and team meetings. - Works closely with other members of the Archives & Special Collections team to plan for the area's functional operations, to ensure that team goals and objectives are met, and to achieve an efficient and collegial team environment. - Responsible for establishment and expenditure of endowment funds as appropriate and related to her/his curatorial areas. 6. Professional Service and Professional Development - Participates in ASC and Library programs. - Contributes to the life of the University. - Participates in appropriate professional activities. - Represents the University in appropriate professional associations, consortia and projects. 7. Other duties as assigned. Qualifications Minimum Qualifications: 1. A graduate degree in Library or Information Science from a program accredited by the American Library Association. 2. Understanding of issues and challenges relating to human rights documentation. 3. Three years experience in an academic library, archives, or related institution. 4. Two years experience working with digital content in a repository or archival setting. 5. Ability to work independently, identifying problems, implementing revisions and changes to policies and creating and implementing new policies. 6. Excellent written and verbal communication skills. 7. Demonstrated ability to work in a team-based environment. Additional Qualifications for Appointment as Librarian III: 1. Six years experience in an academic library, archives, or related institution. 2. Three years experience working with digital content in a repository or archival setting. Preferred Qualifications: 1. Experience with digital content management and digital curation. 2. Demonstrated work or field experience in human rights documentation. 3. 3-6 years experience in an academic research library or archives. 4. Experience working with archiving web and/or social media resources. 5. 1-3 years of archival experience, including for example reference, arrangement and description, or digital curation. 6. Experience with Archivists Toolkit or similar collections management application. 7. Undergraduate or graduate degree in human rights or related field. 8. Significant contributions to the archival or library profession including professional committee membership or publications. Appointment Terms This is a full-time, permanent position. Salary is commensurate with qualifications and experience and includes a full benefits package. To Apply Please submit a cover letter addressing your qualifications for the position, a current resume, and names and contact information for three references via Husky Hire. This job posting is scheduled to close on 5/25/2012. The University of Connecticut is an EEO/AA employer.

DECLARATORIA DE BOGOTÁ DE LOS ARCHIVOS DEL SECTOR DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS - NOVIEMBRE 2011

ARCHIVEROS SIN FRONTERAS - COLOMBIA Bogotá D.C. - Colombia info@asfcolombia.org
 En el marco de la I JORNADA DE ARCHIVOS DEL SECTOR DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS: Investigación, Memoria, Desclasificación, Políticas y Acceso, organizada por Archiveros sin Fronteras - Colombia y realizada en Bogotá el 22 de noviembre de 2011, se abordó el tema central de los archivos de los derechos humanos y su relación con la investigación para la reconstrucción de la memoria histórica, el acceso, la transparencia y la desclasificación de los documentos. National Security Archive. National Security Archive, Proyecto Profis GIZ, Redes Locales Ciudadanas, Soft & Di, y la Universidad Externado de Colombia.
DECLARATORIA DE BOGOTÁ DE LOS ARCHIVOS DEL SECTOR DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS - NOVIEMBRE 2011 1. Reglamentar con un enfoque diferencial el tratamiento técnico de los archivos del sector de los derechos humanos, tanto públicos como privados, que permita su pronta organización y utilidad como herramienta para la restitución de los derechos de las víctimas del conflicto armado.
2. Convocar al Archivo General de la Nación de Colombia e instituciones académicas, para que implementen programas de capacitación a las organizaciones gubernamentales y no gubernamentales del sector de los derechos humanos, para que sus integrantes puedan apropiarse de los procesos de organización y preservación de sus archivos.
3. Elaborar una guía de orientación para la organización y preservación de los archivos del sector de los derechos humanos, que también incluya el manejo y custodia de todos los soportes que los integran, entre otros: papel, video, audio, fotografía, fílmico, audiovisual, medio magnético, electrónico y análogo.
4. Solicitar la participación de personal técnico, tecnólogo y profesional formado en la disciplina archivística, para garantizar una adecuada gestión documental del sector de los derechos humanos.
5. Intervenir los archivos estatales fundamentales para la investigación de graves violaciones de derechos humanos, con el propósito de que sean debidamente organizados y protegidos y que su consulta sea facilitada a las víctimas y a sus apoderados. Se recomienda que esta labor la lidere el Archivo General de la Nación de Colombia.
6. Establecer, en el proceso de reglamentación de la Ley 1448 de 2011 Ley de Víctimas, la delimitación de competencias del Centro de Memoria Histórica y del Archivo General de la Nación, respecto de los archivos del sector de los derechos humanos.
7. Comprender que el proceso de construcción de memoria no puede estar cifrado por una fecha de inicio y que ante la vigencia del conflicto se deben analizar sus manifestaciones en la sociedad actual.
8. Propender por que el proceso de construcción de memoria del conflicto sea liderado por las victimas e involucre a los grupos de memoria que trabajan en las diferentes regiones colombianas.
9. Crear espacios de estudio, análisis y concertación para determinar cuál entidad dentro de la cadena de custodia y bajo qué parámetros, se encargará de los archivos generados por las organizaciones sociales defensoras de los derechos humanos, garantizando la integridad, conservación y accesibilidad contando con la voluntad de las víctimas de publicar sus testimonios.
10. Conminar a las entidades estatales a cumplir con la responsabilidad legal, de salvaguardar los archivos a su cargo, con especial atención al sector de los archivos de derechos humanos.
11. Formular por parte del Gobierno las políticas, planes, programas y normatividad que promueva el derecho de acceso a la información pública, de acuerdo con los estándares internacionales.
12. Propender por que se promulgue una ley de acceso a la información en la que la desclasificación de los documentos, establezca períodos límites de tiempo, con base en el tratamiento especial que requiere la información sensible contenida en estos archivos, atendiendo el derecho a la intimidad, la verdad, la justicia y la reparación.
Esta Declaratoria contribuye al fortalecimiento de la discusión sobre la realidad de los archivos del sector de los derechos humanos en medio de una Justicia Transicional, para la construcción de una política pública acerca del tratamiento técnico de estos archivos.

Invitamos a toda la sociedad, en especial a las organizaciones de la sociedad civil, la comunidad archivística y la academia tanto a nivel nacional como internacional, a adherirse a esta Declaratoria.

Nombre Entidad / Persona natural

Nit / documento identidad

Ciudad

Firma

 
Diversos expertos del ámbito nacional e internacional acompañaron el diálogo con las organizaciones de la sociedad civil y la academia, para identificar la problemática de los archivos de este sector en cuanto a los aspectos técnicos objeto de la Jornada. Teniendo en cuenta que los archivos de este sector son herramienta para la restitución de los derechos humanos y la recuperación de la memoria histórica, específicamente se trataron temas como la problemática y el papel de los archivos para la defensa de los derechos humanos, los archivos en el marco de la Ley de Victimas, los avances de la Ley de Transparencia que cursa en el Congreso y la experiencia del
Las entidades que participaron en el evento, fueron: Archivo Familia Jorge Eliecer Gaitán, Asociación para la Promoción Social Alternativa MINGA, Centro Alteridad y Derechos Humanos, Centro de Memoria Paz y Reconciliación de la Secretaría de Gobierno de la Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá D.C., Centro de Investigación Y Educación Popular CINEP, Colectivo de Abogados José Alvear Restrepo, Comisión Colombiana de Juristas, Comisión Intereclesial de Justicia y Paz, Consultoría para los Derechos Humanos y el Desplazamiento – CODHES, Corporación Claretiana Norman Pérez Bello, Corporación Fondo de Solidaridad con los Jueces Colombianos FASOL, Escuela Interamericana de Bibliotecología de la Universidad de Antioquia, Fundación AFFIC Ciencias Forenses al Servicio de la Justicia y los Derechos Humanos, Fundación Karisma, Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa FLIP, Grupo de Normatividad del Archivo General de la Nación de Colombia, Junta de Acción Comunal La Ponderosa, Justapaz Comisión de Paz de CEDECOL, Movimiento Nacional de Victimas,
Los temas fueron analizados y debatidos en cuatro mesas de trabajo. Como resultado se acordó presentar públicamente, ante distintas instancias, las conclusiones reunidas en la siguiente declaratoria para salvaguardar el patrimonio documental que testimonia el conflicto armado vivido en las últimas décadas en Colombia, reconocido en la Ley Víctimas y también para garantizar su organización, acceso y desclasificación.